Notice of Requirement – Rotokauri Strategic Infrastructure Designation

This includes all the documents and reports that are relevant to processing the NOR application.

Notice of Requirement – Rotokauri Strategic Infrastructure Designation – 19 September 2024 

Appendix A – Land requirement plans

Appendix B.1 – Concept design drawings

Appendix B.2 – Roading drawings

Appendix B.3 – Stormwater drawings

Appendix C – Consideration of alternatives report

Appendix D – Design report

Appendix E – Records of Title (ordered)

Appendix F – Archaeological assessment

Appendix G – Ecological impact assessment

Appendix H – Landscape and visual assessment 

Appendix I – Cultural impact assessment

Appendix J – ULDF framework

Appendix K – Acoustic assessment

Appendix L – Preliminary site investigation (contamination)

Appendix M – Consultation summary

Appendix N – Integrated transport assessment

Appendix O – KiwiRail optioneering summary

A legal submission is a formal document presented to the hearing panel, containing specific requests for outcomes or actions. This section includes legal memorandums and responses to Commissioner Directions and Legal Memorandums.

Requiring Authority

Opening legal submissions on behalf of the Requiring Authority

1 - Memorandum of counsel for RA - 6 May 2025

2 - Memorandum of Counsel for RA - 30 September 2025

HCC – Reporting Team

1 - Memorandum of counsel for Reporting team - 30 July 2025

Submitters

Legal Submission - Te Rapa Gateway Ltd - 08 October 2025

Commissioner Directions are guidelines and instructions provided during the planning and hearing processes.

s42A Report 30 May 2025 

Appendix A Matters that a territorial authority must consider 

Appendix B Maps (see below section).

Appendix C Specialist’s Evaluation – Transportation 

Appendix D Specialist’s Evaluation – 3-Waters 

Appendix E Specialist’s Evaluation – Ecology 

Appendix F Specialist’s Evaluation – Geotechnical 

Appendix G - Specialist's Evaluation - Contaminated Land 

Appendix H - Specialist's Evaluation - Noise and Vibrations 

Appendix I - Specialist's Evaluation - Landscape 

Appendix J - Specialist's Evaluation - Urban Design 

Appendix K -Specialist's Evaluation - Archaeology 

Appendix L - Relevant statutory considerations that were not addressed in s9 of the NOR 

Appendix M - Recommended Designation Conditions 

Appendix N - Reasons for the Recommended Amendments to the Proposed Designation Conditions 

Appendix O - Planning provisions relating to managing the effects of climate change and flood hazard 

Fig.01 Proposed Rotokauri Strategic Infrastructure Designation – Submitters’ Properties 

Fig.02 Issues raised in submission No 1 by Nan Su 

Fig.03 Issues raised in submission No 2 by Michael Jamieson 

Fig.04 Issues raised in submission No 4 by Watson Lands Limited 

Fig.05 Issues raised in submission No 5 by New Zealand Transport Agency 

Fig.06 Issues raised in submission No 6 by Te Rapa Gateway Limited 

Fig.07 Issues raised in submission No 7 by Steve Godley & Adam Marsh 

Fig.08 Issues raised in submission No 8 by KiwiRail Holdings Limited 

Fig.09 Issues raised in submission No 9 by Steve Nuich et al 

Fig.10 Issues raised in submission No 9 by Steve Nuich et al 

Fig.11 Re submission No 9 Proposed alternative positions of arterial road and wetlands 

Fig.12 Issues raised in submission No 10 by Allister Gillam 

Fig.13 Issues raised in submission No 11 by Te Kowhai East LP 

Fig.14 Issues raised in submission No 12 by The owners of 88 Exelby Road 

Fig.15 Issues raised in submission No 13 by Hounsell Holdings Ltd et al 

Fig.16 Issues raised in submission No 14 by Rotokauri Development Limited 

Fig.17 Issues raised in submission No 15 by Pragma Holdings Limited 

Fig.18 Proposed Rotokauri Strategic Infrastructure Designation 

Fig.19 Issues raised in submission No 16 by Phillip Laird et al (Figure 19 300dpi) 

Fig.20 Issues raised in submission No 18 by Narinderpal Sagoo 

Fig.21 Transport Corridors designed under the PDA between HCC and Hounsell Holdings Ltd 

Fig.22 Rotokauri Greenway Work Extent 

Fig.23 Proposed extent of Minor Arterial transport corridor to be constructed by Hounsell Holdings Ltd 

Statement of evidence of Tony Denton (Project Sponsor)

Statement of evidence of Christopher Hick (Road and Civil Design)

Statement of evidence of Craig Richards (Transport)

Statement of evidence of Philip McQueen (Level Crossing)

Statement of evidence of James Bell-Booth (Acoustic)

Statement of evidence of Thomas Abbott (Urban Design)

Statement of evidence of William Gumbley (Landscape and Visual)

Statement of evidence of Holly Scott (Contaminated Land)

Statement of evidence of Sian Keith (Archaeology)

Statement of evidence of Claire Webb (Ecology)

Statement of evidence of Iain Smith (Stormwater)

Statement of evidence of Melissa Slatter (Planning)

Attachment Bundle.pdf

Rebuttal evidence of Melissa Slatter (Planning) on behalf of HCC (as Requiring Authority)

These are formal meetings where submitters can present their views in person to the decision-makers. It's an opportunity for further discussion and clarification of the issues raised in submissions.

Tabled Statements

Decision notification

Decision 

Appendices